Private practices and counselling services
See the clinician workflow against the way you actually work, and tell us what would help and what would get in the way.
Work with us
Seeking evaluation partners
Healing Space UK is in early-stage evaluation preparation. We are looking for organisations to look at it critically and help work out where continuity of this kind genuinely helps — and where it does not. The aim is better-informed appointments, less unnecessary administration and stronger continuity between sessions; none of that has been shown yet, which is exactly why evaluation matters.
Who we would like to hear from
Different organisations, the same starting point: a demonstration and an honest conversation, including about where this would not work.
Universities and research organisations
Whether preserving therapeutic context helps is an open research question. We would like to talk about evaluating it properly — including the study designs that could prove us wrong.
Innovation and evaluation organisations
Challenge the approach, the evidence plan and the governance path. Critical feedback is the point, not a formality.
How evaluation is staged
Demonstrations and real-patient evaluation are different things, and we keep them apart.
Now — demonstrations, synthetic data only
A walkthrough of the product as it actually is, using synthetic data. No real patient information is involved, and the limits are stated up front.
Next — workflow and usability evaluation
Structured feedback from clinicians on the workflow and its usability, agreed with you and still without real patients.
Later — clinical evaluation, subject to approval
Any evaluation involving real patients happens only after the right governance is in place — including a completed DPIA, clinical safety-case work and ethics approval where needed. No clinical pilot is running today.
How it is meant to be paid for
This is the intended model, written down before anyone pays. It is not a price list, and Healing Space is not on general sale.
Services pay, patients never do
The intended model is one per-clinician licence, agreed in writing and fixed — no metering and no per-patient fees. Patient access is always £0.
Evaluation shapes it
Services that help evaluate Healing Space early shape what it becomes. Any terms that follow are agreed in writing.
Leave freely
No lock-in is part of the intended model, and a service that decides to stop would have its data exported for it on request.
What your clinicians would get
A continuity layer around the work they already do — not a second records system to maintain.
Preparation that is already done (available now)
Session Prep built around the interval since the last confirmed session: what the patient chose to share, the agenda they wrote, what was agreed last time and, where the patient shares them, mood, sleep and questionnaire movement — with the original entry always reachable.
What was agreed, kept
After a session the clinician records what was agreed, in their own words — so what was agreed and when has an answer rather than a recollection.
Boundaries that stay yours
The platform does not give clinicians the patient’s conversation, is not offered as a risk-monitoring tool, and makes no response-time promise. Safety monitoring and clinical judgement remain with your service.
What a future pilot would look like
Only once governance allows it. Teams adopt safely when the rollout is honest about its pace; this is the shape we propose, and the detail would be agreed with you.
Before anyone is invited — boundaries
Clinician accounts, roles, escalation boundaries, response expectations and governance contacts agreed before any patient is invited.
The first weeks — a small caseload, then tuning
A few patients start first, so clinicians can see what actually reaches them — and what does not, because a patient chose to keep it private. Then the workflow is tuned around how they already work.
Then — an honest review
What was genuinely useful, what got in the way, and what you would want changed. We would rather hear the second two.
What we will not pretend
Assurance claims are cheap. Here is where we honestly are — the same list a procurement process would ask for.
Not NHS-approved, not validated
No NHS approval or assessment, no NHS deployment, no independent clinical validation, no regulatory approval, and no deployment at scale. We do not claim any of them, and we will say so the day that changes.
No outcome evidence
We have not shown that this improves therapeutic outcomes. Our conversations with clinicians, researchers and evaluators are about evaluation — not endorsements or partnerships, and nobody is named for credibility.
Governance work in progress
A DPIA and formal information-governance review are in preparation and not yet complete, and no independent penetration test or accessibility audit has been carried out. The Trust Centre lists the status of each.
One platform, seen from four sides
The same intervention, described for the people who use it differently.
Talk to us about your service
Request a demonstration, tell us why this would not work where you are, or start a conversation about evaluating it — all three are useful to us.